Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
project:sprinklers [2024-04-17 Wed wk16 13:11] – [Sprinkler Solenoid 24VAC Woes] baumkp | project:sprinklers [2024-04-30 Tue wk18 17:22] (current) – [Sprinkler Solenoid 24VAC Woes] baumkp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I would consider normal supply voltage tolerance to be minimum +/-10% this aligns with the IEC standard for electrical power distribution. So a 24VAC system should be able to absolutely reliably operate between 21.6 to 26.4 VAC. As the solenoid operation voltage was typically between 25 - 26VAC this condition is meet. The stand-by voltage was not a concern for the solenoid operation and the controller clear had no problems with this. Checking the controller circuit I would expect it would reliably operate with 24VAC ± 20% or 19.2 to 28.8 VAC. The controller solid state outputs had 40V snubbers which could start snubbing the sinusoidal peak voltage over 28.2 VAC RMS. | I would consider normal supply voltage tolerance to be minimum +/-10% this aligns with the IEC standard for electrical power distribution. So a 24VAC system should be able to absolutely reliably operate between 21.6 to 26.4 VAC. As the solenoid operation voltage was typically between 25 - 26VAC this condition is meet. The stand-by voltage was not a concern for the solenoid operation and the controller clear had no problems with this. Checking the controller circuit I would expect it would reliably operate with 24VAC ± 20% or 19.2 to 28.8 VAC. The controller solid state outputs had 40V snubbers which could start snubbing the sinusoidal peak voltage over 28.2 VAC RMS. | ||
- | Next I measured the DC resistance of a new solenoid at 33.1 Ω. Based upon the specification printed on the Solenoid 24 VAC, 50/60 Hz, Holding 0.25 Amp and inrush 0.43 Amp maximum I calculated the solenoid impedance to be 96.0 Ω. This means the solenoid holding reactance calculates as 90.1 Ω. The solenoid apparent power is 6.0 VA and real power 2.07 W. With 25.2 VAC supply at the solenoid this becomes 0.264 A current, 6.68VA apparent power and 2.3 W real power. | + | Next I measured the DC resistance of a new solenoid at 33.1 Ω. Based upon the specification printed on the Solenoid 24 VAC, 50/60 Hz, Holding 0.25 Amp and inrush 0.43 Amp maximum I calculated the solenoid impedance to be 96.0 Ω. This means the solenoid holding reactance calculates as 90.1 Ω. The solenoid apparent power is 6.0 VA and real power 2.07 W. With 25.2 VAC supply at the solenoid this becomes 0.264 A current, 6.68VA apparent power and 2.3 W real power. |
A USA based brochure for the K-Rain Valve KR7101 gives the following specification for the valve: Voltage: 24VAC 60 cycles, 0.4 amps in rush, 0.2 amps holding. Pressure 20 psi minimum to 150 psi. This aligns well with the calculation showing 0.21 Amp at 24 VAC 60 Hz. | A USA based brochure for the K-Rain Valve KR7101 gives the following specification for the valve: Voltage: 24VAC 60 cycles, 0.4 amps in rush, 0.2 amps holding. Pressure 20 psi minimum to 150 psi. This aligns well with the calculation showing 0.21 Amp at 24 VAC 60 Hz. | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
- New solenoid valves are dual rated for 50/60Hz and significantly relies upon the solenoid reactance. The reactance is directly proportional to the frequency that affects the operating solenoid current and power draw. In 50Hz applications the current and power draw are higher and hence the solenoid has less tolerance to over rated voltage. | - New solenoid valves are dual rated for 50/60Hz and significantly relies upon the solenoid reactance. The reactance is directly proportional to the frequency that affects the operating solenoid current and power draw. In 50Hz applications the current and power draw are higher and hence the solenoid has less tolerance to over rated voltage. | ||
- I suspect the new solenoid valves are actually optimised for 60Hz operation not 50Hz and this has been the root cause of the new valve solenoid problems I have been having. | - I suspect the new solenoid valves are actually optimised for 60Hz operation not 50Hz and this has been the root cause of the new valve solenoid problems I have been having. | ||
- | - A readily available 12 Ω, 1 W resistor at cost of less than $1.00 seems to be a simple solution to rectify the solenoid failure problem. | + | - A readily available 12 Ω, 1 W resistor at cost of less than $1.00 is a simple solution to rectify the solenoid failure problem. |
Some additional comments: | Some additional comments: | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
- Avoid the use of single sprinkler wiring in more complex larger sprinkler reticulation systems. | - Avoid the use of single sprinkler wiring in more complex larger sprinkler reticulation systems. | ||
- I do not like jar top style valves, just a personal preference though. | - I do not like jar top style valves, just a personal preference though. | ||
- | - An inductor instead of a resistor may be a more effective solution to reduce the solenoid current and overall real power consumption, | + | - An inductor instead of a resistor may be a more effective solution to reduce the solenoid current and overall real power consumption, |
+ | After 8 weeks of reliable operation with no further solenoid failure the use of a 12 Ω resistor to limit solenoid current and power draw has rectified the solenoid failure problem. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
*[[https:// | *[[https:// |