Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
linux_router:qemu [2024-05-18 Sat wk20 17:59] – baumkplinux_router:qemu [2024-06-04 Tue wk23 11:35] (current) – baumkp
Line 1: Line 1:
 {{tag>linux router VM}} {{tag>linux router VM}}
 ======Router VM====== ======Router VM======
-I have just decided to play with installing VM (virtual machines) on my Router hardware (2023-01).  I have been reluctant to do this for a number of reasons.  My separate listing for [[linux_router:hardware]].  Basically the machine is a bit old slow and under powered.  Still basically adequate for what it does.  I do not run a desktop on this machine, CLI (Command Line Interface only).  The main services I am currently running on this machine are, all bare metal:+I have just decided to play with installing VM (virtual machines) on my Router hardware (2023-01).  I have been reluctant to do this for a number of reasons.  My separate listing for [[linux_router:hardware]].  Basically the machine is a bit old slow and under powered, but still adequate for what it does.  I do not run a desktop on this machine, CLI (Command Line Interface only).  The main services I am currently running on this machine are, all bare metal:
   * Network configuration (of 4 x 1 GB/s ethernet ports)   * Network configuration (of 4 x 1 GB/s ethernet ports)
     * Access to public internet modem, via 1 Ethernet port - **the WAN (Wide Area Network) connection**     * Access to public internet modem, via 1 Ethernet port - **the WAN (Wide Area Network) connection**
-      * modem is VDSL based, set into bridge mode to allow connection to control using this machine as router +      * Early 2024 I was upgraded to a full fibre internet connection.  A connection box / modem converts the fibre to RJ45 1GB/s ethernet IP connection inside the house.  The old ISP supplied VDSL modem/router does have a WAN input that works, however the all the ethernet connections are limited to 100Mb/s.  Hence on the 250Mb/s plan this router is not fully suitable for purpose. 
-        * modem is currently set to use direct remote DHCP/IP as specified by ISP (Internet Service Provider requirements), was originally setup using PPPoE. +
-        * There is also as separate static IP address setup to access and control the modem+
     * A bridge network setup on the remaining 3 Ethernet ports as a LAN (Local Area Network). The bridge network setup has the following required features:     * A bridge network setup on the remaining 3 Ethernet ports as a LAN (Local Area Network). The bridge network setup has the following required features:
       * It allows connections of multiple physical Ethernet ports to a bridge interface device, with the bridge effectively acting as a network switch for the connected physical ports.  (On my home server I have 4 x 1GB/s Ethernet ports and an add in PCIe card that provided a 2.5GB/s Ethernet port. All these physical ports are connected to a common network bridge device. This seem to just work, and each physical device seems to operate at its specific capacity.)       * It allows connections of multiple physical Ethernet ports to a bridge interface device, with the bridge effectively acting as a network switch for the connected physical ports.  (On my home server I have 4 x 1GB/s Ethernet ports and an add in PCIe card that provided a 2.5GB/s Ethernet port. All these physical ports are connected to a common network bridge device. This seem to just work, and each physical device seems to operate at its specific capacity.)