Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
linux_router:background [2024-02-24 Sat wk08 13:18] – [Linux Router Background] baumkplinux_router:background [2026-04-26 Sun wk17 16:16] (current) – [Linux Router Background] baumkp
Line 16: Line 16:
 In early 2024 I requested an upgrade to get fibre in to my house for primary internet access (FTTP). Once the fibre and modem were connected things worked prety quickly, save at this time I found my Router modem BMC was not working properly and need a new battery.  Also my old back DSL modem Router that had WAN eithernet input was limiting performance, 100M ethernet connection with 100M fibre..... Unfortunately my ISP (Internet Service Provider) messed up the process and had my existing copper connection (FTTN) disconnected over 3 weeks before the fibre installation was installed. Save for router hardware problems, the fibre install worked immediately. My static IPv4 address took another 4 weeks to get working correctly, basically because of the ISP. So after a few days hot spotting of mobile phones, where my son had already run out of data, I purchased a 4G modem and set up 4G access with a local supplier.  This is so much slower and unreliable compared to the hardwired connection.  Also I lost my static IP that stopped external Internet access to my various servers, email, wiki, & cloud.  For 3 - 4 weeks I could not be bother setting up an alternative.  All the services still work on my LAN except the email server.  (The email server does actually operate on my LAN but it pretty pointless without access to external internet!)  I was lucky that my server SSL certificates should be valid through this period.  Interestingly the mobile services seem to work reasonably well for working from home, basically office/company VPN access. MSSharepoint and MSTeams. I hate MS Sharepoint but that is a whole other discussion / diatribe. In early 2024 I requested an upgrade to get fibre in to my house for primary internet access (FTTP). Once the fibre and modem were connected things worked prety quickly, save at this time I found my Router modem BMC was not working properly and need a new battery.  Also my old back DSL modem Router that had WAN eithernet input was limiting performance, 100M ethernet connection with 100M fibre..... Unfortunately my ISP (Internet Service Provider) messed up the process and had my existing copper connection (FTTN) disconnected over 3 weeks before the fibre installation was installed. Save for router hardware problems, the fibre install worked immediately. My static IPv4 address took another 4 weeks to get working correctly, basically because of the ISP. So after a few days hot spotting of mobile phones, where my son had already run out of data, I purchased a 4G modem and set up 4G access with a local supplier.  This is so much slower and unreliable compared to the hardwired connection.  Also I lost my static IP that stopped external Internet access to my various servers, email, wiki, & cloud.  For 3 - 4 weeks I could not be bother setting up an alternative.  All the services still work on my LAN except the email server.  (The email server does actually operate on my LAN but it pretty pointless without access to external internet!)  I was lucky that my server SSL certificates should be valid through this period.  Interestingly the mobile services seem to work reasonably well for working from home, basically office/company VPN access. MSSharepoint and MSTeams. I hate MS Sharepoint but that is a whole other discussion / diatribe.
  
-Some Internet speed data from early 2024 +Some Internet speed data from early 2024 and 2025 
-|<40em >| +|<60em >| 
-^ tech ^ down [Mbps] ^ up [Mbps] ^ latency [ms] ^ +^ tech ^ down [Mbps] ^ up [Mbps] ^ ping [ms] ^ latency down [ms] ^ latency up [ms] ^ 
-| 4g modem router | 17 - 24 | 2 - 4 | 25 - 40 | +| 4g modem router | 17 - 24 | 2 - 4 | 25 - 40 | - | - | 
-| fibre 100/20, 100Mbps ethernet router | 95 - 97 | 16 - 17 | 3 - 4| +| fibre 100/20, 100Mbps ethernet router | 95 - 97 | 16 - 17 | 3 - 4| - | - | 
-| fibre 100/20, 1000Mbps ethernet router | 98 - 104 | 16 - 18 | 3 - 4| +| fibre 100/20, 1000Mbps ethernet router | 98 - 104 | 16 - 18 | 3 - 4| - | - | 
-| fibre 250/25, 1000Mbps ethernet router | 248 - 270 | 21 - 24 | 3 - 4|+| fibre 250/25, 1000Mbps ethernet router | 248 - 270 | 21 - 24 | 3 - 4| - | - | 
 +| fibre 500/50, 2500Mbps ethernet router | 520 - 535 | 42 - 45 | 1.6 - 2.2| 7 - 9 | 100 - 110 | 
 +| fibre 1000/100, 2500Mbps ethernet router | 900 - 920 | 89 - 93 | 1 - 2| 7 - 8 | 36 - 38 | 
 +| fibre 1000/400, 2500Mbps ethernet router | 900 - 920 | 365 - 370 | 1 - 2| 7 - 8 | 35 - 37 |
 Notes: Notes:
   -The 100Mbps ethernet router was a TP-Link VDSL modem router with 4 100Mbps ethernet ports and 2 VoIP port. One ethernet port was set up as WAN connection.   -The 100Mbps ethernet router was a TP-Link VDSL modem router with 4 100Mbps ethernet ports and 2 VoIP port. One ethernet port was set up as WAN connection.
   -The 1000Mbps ethernet router was a N3700 router with 4 1000Mbps ethernet ports running Linux Debian.   -The 1000Mbps ethernet router was a N3700 router with 4 1000Mbps ethernet ports running Linux Debian.
 +  -The 2500/10000Mbps ethernet router was a i305 router with 2 x 2500Mbps and 2 x 10000Mbps ethernet ports running Linux Debian. (The WAN is connected to a 2.5Gbps port)
   -The speed tester was run in automatic mode, it seemed to find the local test point   -The speed tester was run in automatic mode, it seemed to find the local test point
   -The speed tester was run on a VM not on the router, this may slightly increase latency time   -The speed tester was run on a VM not on the router, this may slightly increase latency time
-  -Latency = ping time on the speed tester+  - Ping = ping time on the speed tester 
 +  - Latency down and up are the average from the speed tester
   -The speed tester also had a measurement for jitter   -The speed tester also had a measurement for jitter
   -Clearly the router with 100Mbps ethernet was limiting the 100Mbps WAN connection.  The same would be expected on 1000Mbps ethernet with 1000Mbps WAN, although local WAN supplier indicated that 1000Mbps WAN is normally only 650Mbps during congested periods.   -Clearly the router with 100Mbps ethernet was limiting the 100Mbps WAN connection.  The same would be expected on 1000Mbps ethernet with 1000Mbps WAN, although local WAN supplier indicated that 1000Mbps WAN is normally only 650Mbps during congested periods.